1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 e6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.O-O Ne7 6.d4 Nbc6 7.cxd5 exd5 8.Nc3 Bg4 9.Bg5 h6 10.Bxe7 Nxe7 11.Ne5 Be6 12.e3 c6 13.Nd3 { I was now very optimistic about my prospects as I'd had this position several times before. Black has 2 bishops but it's hard to get active play for the one on g7. White has a straightforward attack with b4 and b5 to weaken black's pawns. Black will then either get a weak pawn on c6 in which case white's knight has the beautiful square c5, or black will get an isolated d-pawn in which case white's knight will go to f4 to attck that pawn. } 13...h5 { But this was a new idea to me. Black does not want to castle and allow the technical sort of position discussed above. Instead he goes for a kingside attack to distract white. } 14.b4 a6 15.a4 Bf5 16.Qd2 h4 17.b5 hxg3 18.hxg3 g5! { With the idea Qd6 and Qh6. } 19.bxc6 bxc6 20.Rfe1! { White must be active in the centre. } 20...Kf8 21.Nc5 a5 22.e4⁈ { This leads to simplifications and a draw. I feel this position shouuld be good for white but I still don't see a clear continuation - maybe I'm wrong. I wanted to play Rad1 first but Bg4 seems annoying. } 22...dxe4 23.N3xe4 Qxd4 24.Qxg5 Rd8 ( 24...Qxa1? 25.Rxa1 Bxa1 26.Nd6 ) 25.Nb7 Bxe4 26.Nxd8 Bf6 27.Qf4 Bxg2 28.Qxd4 Bxd4 29.Kxg2 ( 29.Kxg2 Bxa1 30.Rxa1 Rh5 31.Rc1 Rd5= ) ½-½